1. Вестник древней истории 4 (82)
2. Studia Dionea novissima: Historical Narrative, Interpretations of the Past and Political Contexts of Cassius Dio’s “Roman History”. Part II

Studia Dionea novissima: Historical Narrative, Interpretations of the Past and Political Contexts of Cassius Dio’s “Roman History”. Part II

Марков Константин Владимирович, Махлаюк Александр Валентинович

В статье, продолжающей обзор современных исследований Кассия Диона, основное внимание уделяется спорным вопросам о повествовательных модусах и моделях его «Римской истории», в том числе рассматриваются роль различных речей в их историческом контексте, корреляция между анналистическим и биографическим нарративами, трактовка Дионом государственных институтов, и прежде всего их эволюции в период перехода от Республики к Принципату. Анализируются также мнения современных исследователей, касающиеся политической и литературной карьеры Диона, его политических воззрений, дискуcсии о наилучшей форме правления в книге LII. Настоящий обзор показывает, что современные исследователи полностью отказались от устаревшего представления о Дионе как о «плагиаторе» или «компиляторе». В настоящее время Дион оценивается как автор, у которого была четкая повествовательная стратегия, детально проработанная структура нарратива и осознанный выбор историографических методов и литературной техники. Недавние исследования обнаруживают, с одной стороны, разнообразие подходов историка, применяемых к различным частям его труда, а с другой – ряд повторяющихся тем и вопросов. Большинство этих связующих элементов относится к сфере политических установок автора, и вся концептуальная основа дионовского повествования тесно связана с репрезентацией парадигм политического лидерства.

Ключевые слова: Кассий Дион, греко-римская историография, историческая причинность, исторический нарратив, методология историографии, современная историография

Библиография:

Aalders, G.J.D. 1986: Cassius Dio and the Greek world. Mnemosyne 39/3–4, 282–304.

Adler, E. 2008: Boudicca’s speeches in Tacitus and Dio. Classical World 101/2, 173–195.

Adler, E. 2012: Cassius Dio’s Agrippa-Maecenas debate: an operational code analysis. American Journal of Philology 133/3, 477–520.

Ameling, W. 1997: Griechische Intellektuelle und das Imperium Romanum: Das Beispiel Cassius Dio. In: W. Haase (Hrsg.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II.34/3, 2472–2496.

André, J.M. 1967: Mécène: Essai de biographie spirituelle, Paris.

Asirvatham, S.R. 2020: Cassius Dio, Ὁµόνοια, and civil war. In: С. Lange, А. Scott (eds.), Cassius Dio: The Impact of Violence, War, and Civil War. Leiden–Boston, 289–312.

Avallone, R. 1962: Mecenate. Naples.

Barnes, T.D. 1984: The composition of Cassius Dio’s ‘Roman History’. Phoenix 38/3, 240–255.

Baron, C. 2019: Wrinkles in time: chronological puptures in Cassius Dio’s narrative of the late Republic. In: J. Osgood, C. Baron (eds.), Cassius Dio and the Late Roman Republic. Leiden–Boston, 50–71.

Bellissime, M. 2016: Polysémie, contextualization, re-sémantisation: à propos de µοναρχία et de δηµοκρατία. In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. 2 vols. Bordeaux, 529–544.

Bertrand, E. 2015: Cassius Dion et les cycles de l’histoire: du topos littéraire à la réflexion historique. In: E. Bertrand, R. Campatangelo-Soussignan (eds.), Cycles de la Nature, Cycles de l’Histoire. De la découverte des météores à la fin de l’âge d’or. (Scripta Antiqua, 76). Bordeaux, 163–172.

Bertrand, E. 2020: Cassius Dio and the Roman Empire: the impact of the Severan wars on Dio’s narrative. In: C. Lange, A. Scott (eds.), Cassius Dio: The Impact of Violence, War, and Civil War. Leiden–Boston, 120–137.

Bertrand, E., Coudry, M. 2016: De Pompée à Auguste: les mutations de l’imperium militiae. 2. Un traitement particulier dans l’Histoire romaine de Dion. In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. 2 vols. Bordeaux, 595–608.

Bertrand, E., Coudry, M., Fromentin, V. 2016: Temporalité historique et formes du récit. Les modalités de l’écriture dans les livres tardo-républicains. In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. 2 vols. Bordeaux, 303–316.

Bleicken, J. 1962: Der politische Standpunkt Dios gegenüber der Monarchie. Hermes 90/4, 444–467.

Bono, M. 2019: Riflessioni sulla lacuna nel dibattito Agrippa–Mecenate (Dio 52.13.7–14.1). Athenaeum 107/2, 479–502.

Bono, M. 2020: Teoria politica e scrittura storiografica nei ‘libri imperiali’ della Storia Romana di Cassio Dione. In: C. Burden-Strevens, J.M. Madsen, A. Pistellato (eds.), Cassius Dio and the Principate. Venice, 39–66.

Bowersock, G.W. 1965: Review of F. Millar, A Study of Cassius Dio, Oxford 1964. Gnomon 37, 469–474.

Briquel, D. 2016: Origines et période royale. In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. 2 vols. Bordeaux, 125–142.

Burden-Strevens, C. 2015a: Cassius Dio’s Speeches and the Collapse of the Roman Republic. PhD thesis. Glasgow.

Burden-Strevens, C. 2015b: Ein völlig romanisierter Mann? Identity, identification, and integration in the ‘Roman History’ of Cassius Dio and in Arrian. In: S. Roselaar (ed.), Processes of Cultural Change and In tegration in the Roman World. Leiden–Boston, 287–306.

Burden-Strevens, C. 2016a: Review-discussion. Historical knowledge and historiographical narratives in the Severan period (review of Kemezis A., Greek narratives of the Roman Empire under the Severans: Cassius Dio, Philostratus and Herodian, 2014). Histos 10, 9–18.

Burden-Strevens, C. 2016b: Fictitious speeches, envy, and the habituation to authority: writing the collapse of the Roman Republic. In: J.M. Lange, C.H. Madsen (eds.), Cassius Dio: Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden–Boston, 193–216.

Burden-Strevens, C. 2018: Reconstructing Republican oratory in Cassius Dio’s Roman History. In: C. Gray (ed.), Reading Republican Oratory: Reconstructions, Contexts, Receptions. Oxford, 111–134.

Burden-Strevens, C. 2019: The Republican dictatorship: an Imperial perspective. In: J. Osgood, C. Baron (eds.), Cassius Dio and the Late Roman Republic. Leiden–Boston, 36–49.

Burden-Strevens, C. 2020: Cassius Dio’s Speeches and the Collapse of the Roman Republic: The Roman History, Books 3–56. Leiden–Boston.

Burden-Strevens, C. 2023: The Agrippa-Maecenas debate. In: A. Scott, J.M. Madsen (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Cassius Dio. Leiden–Boston, 371–405.

Burden-Strevens, C., Lindholmer, M. (eds.) 2019: Cassius Dio’s Forgotten History of Early Rome. Leiden–Boston.

Burden-Strevens, C., Madsen, J.M., Pistellato, A. 2020: Introduction. In: С. Burden-Strevens, J.M. Madsen, A. Pistellato (eds.), Cassius Dio and the Principate. Venice, 7–17. Carsana, C. 1990: La teoria della “constituzione mista” nell’età imperiale romana. Como.

Carsana, C. 2016: La teoria delle forme di governo: il punto di vista di Cassio Dione sui poteri di Cesare. In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. 2 vols. Bordeaux, 545–558.

Coltelloni-Trannoy, M 2016a: Les temporalités du recít impérial dans l’Histoire romaine de Cassius Dion. In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. 2 vols. Bordeaux, 335–362.

Coltelloni-Trannoy, M. 2016b: La πολιτεία imperial d’après Cassius Dion (livres 52–59). In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. 2 vols. Bordeaux, 559–566.

Coltelloni-Trannoy, M. 2016c: Les procédures sénatoriales à l’époque impériale: les choix de l’historien. In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. 2 vols. Bordeaux, 625–652.

Coudry, M. 2016a: Figures et récit dans les livres républicains (livres 36 à 44). In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. 2 vols. Bordeaux, 287–301.

Coudry, M. 2016b: Institutions et procédures politiques de la République romaine: les choix lexicaux de Cassius Dion. In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. 2 vols. Bordeaux, 485–518.

Coudry, M. 2016c: Sénat et magistrats à la vielle de la guerre civile. In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nou velles lectures. 2 vols. Bordeaux, 519–528.

Coudry, M. 2019a: The ‘Great Men’ of the middle Republic in Cassius Dio’s Roman History. In: C. BurdenStrevens, M. Lindholmer (eds.), Cassius Dio’s Forgotten History of Early Rome. Leiden–Boston, 126–164.

Coudry, M. 2019b: Electoral bribery and the challenge to the authority of the senate: two aspects of Dio’s view of the late Roman Republic (Books 36–40). In: J. Osgood, C. Baron (eds.), Cassius Dio and the Late Ro man Republic. Leiden–Boston, 36–49.

Cresci Marrone, G. 2016: La politica al bivio. Il dibattito Agrippa-Mecenate in Cassio Dione. In: G. Negri, A. Valvo (eds.), Studi su Augusto: in occasione del XX centenario della morte. Turin, 55–76.

Dalla Rosa, A. 2019: Augusto δηµοκρατικός: il commentarius ex quo lex Papia Poppaea lata est, Cassio Dione e la politica augustea del consenso. In: A. Heller, C. Müller, A. Suspène (eds.), Philorômaios kai philhellén. Hommages à Jean-Louis Ferrary. Genève, 153–171.

Davenport, C. 2021: War and peace: imperial leadership in Dio’s second-century narrative. In: C. Davenport, C. Mallan (eds.), Emperors and Political Culture in Cassius Dio’s Roman History. Cambridge–New York, 177–196.

Davenport, C., Mallan, C. 2014: Hadrian’s adoption speech in Cassius Dio’s Roman History and the problems of imperial succession. American Journal of Philology 135/4, 637–668.

Davenport, C., Mallan, C. 2021: Introduction: Cassius Dio: the senator and his Caesars. In: C. Davenport, C. Mallan (eds.), Emperors and Political Culture in Cassius Dio’s Roman History. Cambridge–New York, 1–29.

De Blois, L. 1998–1999: The perception of emperor and empire in Cassius Dio’s Roman History. Ancient Society 29, 267–281.

Devillers, O. 2016a: Cassius Dion et les sources prétacitéennes. In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. 2 vols. Bordeaux, 233–242.

Devillers, O. 2016b: Cassius Dion et l’évolution de l’annalistique. Remarques à propos de le representation des Julio-Claudiens dans l’Histoire romaine. In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. 2 vols. Bordeaux, 317–334.

Eisman, M.M. 1977: Dio and Josephus: parallel analyses. Latomus 36/3, 657–673.

Escribano, M.V. 1999: Estrategias retoricas y pensamiento politico en la Historia Romana de Cassio Dion. L’Antiquité Classique 68, 171–190.

Espinosa Ruiz, U. 1982: Debate Agrippa-Mecenas en Dion Casio. Respuesta senatorial a la crisis del imperio ro mano en epoca Severiana. Madrid.

Espinosa Ruiz, U. 1987: El problema de la historicidad en le debate Agrippa-Mecenas de Dion Casio. Gerion 5, 289–316.

Favuzzi, A. 1990: Retorica e storia in Cassio Dione LII.17/3–4. Annali dell’Univ. degli studi di Bari 33, 147–158.

Fomin, A. 2015: How Dio Wrote History: Dio Cassius’ Intellectual, Historical, and Literary Techniques. PhD thesis. New Brunswick.

Fomin, A. 2016: Speeches in Dio Cassius. In: J.M. Lange, C.H. Madsen (eds.), Cassius Dio: Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden–Boston, 217–237.

France, J. 2016: Financer l’empire: Agrippa, Mécène et Cassius Dion. In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. 2 vols. Bordeaux, 773–786.

Freyburger-Galland, M.-L. 1997: Aspects du vocabulaire politique et institutionnel de Dion Cassius. Paris.

Freyburger-Galland, M.-L. 2013: Dion Cassius, un Gréco-romain du IIe siècle. Dialogues d’histoire ancienne 9, 77–90.

Fromentin, V. 2016: Denys d’Halicarnasse, source et modèle de Cassius Dion? In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. 2 vols. Bordeaux, 179–190.

Fromentin, V. 2021: Cassius Dio scholarship in the 20th & 21st centuries. In: J. Madsen, C. Lange, Cassius Dio the Historian. Methods and Approaches. Leiden–Boston, 23–59.

Gabba, E. 1955: Sulla Storia Romana di Cassio Dione. Rivista Storica Italiana 67, 289–333.

Garnsey, A. 1967: Adultery trials and the survival of the quaestiones in the Severan age. Journal of Roman Studies 57/1–2, 56–60.

Gowing, A 1992: The Triumviral Narratives of Appian and Cassius Dio. Ann Arbor.

Gowing, A.M. 1998: Greek advice for a Roman senator: Cassius Dio and the dialogue between Philiscus and Cicero (38.18–29). Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar 10, 373–390.

Hammond, M. 1932: The significance of the speech of Maecenas in Dio Cassius, book LII. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 63, 88–102.

Havener, W. 2020: “A Warlike Man”: Cassius Dio’s perception and interpretation of the Imperial military persona. In: C. Lange, A. Scott (eds.), Cassius Dio: The Impact of Violence, War, and Civil War. Leiden– Boston, 138–162.

Hidber, T. 2004: Cassius Dio. In: I. de Jong, R. Nünlist, A.M. Bowie (eds.), Narrators, Narratees, and Nar ratives in Ancient Greek Literature: Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative. Vol. 1. Leiden–Boston, 187–199.

Hose, M. 1994: Erneuerung der Vergangenheit. Die Historiker im Imperium Romanum von Florus bis Cassius Dio. Stuttgart–Leipzig.

Hose, M. 2007: Cassius Dio: a senator and historian in the age of anxiety. In: J. Marincola (ed.), A Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography. Chichester, 461–467.

Horst, C. 2010: Zur politischen Funktion des Demokratiebegriffes in der Kaiserzeit: eine Interpretation der Reden des Agrippa und Maecenas (Cassius Dio 52, 1–41). In: T. Schmitt, V.V. Dement’eva (eds.), Volk und Demokratie im Altertum. Gottingen, 189–208.

Imrie, A. 2020: The war comes home: Rome and Romans during civil conflict in the Roman History. In: C. Lange, A. Scott (eds.), Cassius Dio: The Impact of Violence, War, and Civil War. Leiden–Boston, 165–191.

Jones, B. 2016: Cassius Dio: Pepaideumenos and politician on kingship. In: J.M. Lange, C.H. Madsen (eds.), Cassius Dio: Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden–Boston, 297–315.

Kemezis, A.M. 2006: The Roman Past in the Age of the Severans. PhD thesis. Michigan.

Kemezis, A.M. 2014: Greek Narratives of the Roman Empire under the Severans: Cassius Dio, Philostratus and Herodian. Cambridge–New York.

Kemezis, A. 2016: Dio, Caesar and the Vesontio mutineers (38.34–47): a rhetoric of lies. In: J.M. Lange, C.H. Madsen (eds.), Cassius Dio: Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden–Boston, 238–257.

Kuhlmann, P. 2010: Die Maecenas-Rede bei Cassius Dio: Anachronismen und intertextuelle Bezuge. In: D. Pausch (ed.), Stimmen der Geschichte: Funktionen von Reden in der antiken Historiographie. Berlin, 109–123.

Kuhn, C.T. 2022: Cassius Dio’s Asia Minor: biography and historiography. In: A.M. Kemezis, C. Bailey, B. Poletti (eds.), The Intellectual Climate of Cassius Dio: Greek and Roman Pasts. Leiden–Boston, 456–480.

Kuhn-Chen, B. 2002: Geschichtskonzeptionen griechischer Historiker im 2. und 3. Jahrhundert n.Chr. Untersuchungen zu den Werken von Appian, Cassius Dio und Herodian. Frankfurt am Main.

Lachenaud, G. 2016: Récit et discours chez Cassius Dion: frontières, interférences et polyphonie. In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. 2 vols. Bordeaux, 397–415.

Lachenaud, G., Coudry, M. (eds.) 2011: Dion Cassius, Histoire romaine, Livres 38, 39 & 40. Paris.

Lange, C.H. 2019: Cassius Dio on violence, stasis, and civil war: the early years. In: C. Burden-Strevens, M. Lindholmer (eds.), Cassius Dio’s Forgotten History of Early Rome. Leiden–Boston, 165–189.

Lange, C.H. 2020: Talking heads: the Rostra as a conspicuous civil war monument. In: C.H. Lange, A.G. Scott (eds.), Cassius Dio: The Impact of Violence, War, and Civil War. Boston–Leiden, 192–218.

Lange, C.H., Scott, A.G. (eds.) 2020: Cassius Dio: The Impact of Violence, War, and Civil War. Boston–Leiden.

Letta, C. 1979: La composizione dell’opera di Cassio Dione: cronologia e sfondo storico-politico. In: L. Troiani et al. Ricerche di storiografia greca di eta romana. Pisa, 117–189.

Letta, C. 2007: L’eruzione del Vesuvio del 202 d.C. e la composizione dell’opera di Cassio Dione. Athenaeum 1, 41–47.

Letta, C. 2016a: L’uso degli acta senatus nella Storia romana di Cassio Dione. In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. 2 vols. Bordeaux, 243–258.

Letta, C. 2016b: Fonti scritte non letterarie nella Storia romana di Cassio Dione. Studi Classici e Orientali 62, 245– 296.

Letta, C. 2019: La carriera politica di Cassio Dione e la genesi della sua Storia Romana. Studi classici e orientali 65/2, 163–180.

Letta, C. 2021: Literary and documentary sources in Dio’s narrative of the Roman emperors. In: C. Davenport, C. Mallan (eds.), Emperors and Political Culture in Cassius Dio’s Roman History. Cambridge–New York, 74–87.

Lindholmer, M.O. 2018a: Cassius Dio and the age of δυναστεία. Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 58, 561–590.

Lindholmer, M.O. 2018b: Reading diachronically: a new reading of book 36 of Cassius Dio’s Roman History. Histos 12, 139–168.

Lindholmer, M.O. 2019a: Breaking the idealistic paradigm: competition in Dio’s earlier Republic. In: C. Burden-Strevens, M. Lindholmer, (eds.), Cassius Dio’s Forgotten History of Early Rome. Leiden– Boston, 190–216.

Lindholmer, M.O. 2019b: The fall of Cassius Dio’s Roman Republic. Klio 101/2, 473–504.

Lindholmer, M.O. 2020: Cassius Dio’s ideal government and the Imperial senate. In: C. Burden-Strevens, J.M. Madsen, A. Pistellato (eds.), Cassius Dio and the Principate. Venice, 67–94.

Lindholmer, M.O. 2021: The time of composition of Cassius Dio’s Roman History: a reconsideration. Klio 103/1, 133–159.

Lintott, A.W. 1997: Cassius Dio and the history of the late Roman Republic. Aufstieg und Niedergang der römis chen Welt II.34/3, 2497–2523.

Madsen, J.M. 2016: Criticising the benefactors: the Severans and the return of dynastic rule. In: C.H. Lange, J.M. Madsen (eds.), Cassius Dio: Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden–Boston, 136–159.

Madsen, J.M. 2018: Between autopsy reports and historical analysis: the forces and weaknesses of Cassius Dio’s Roman History. Lexis 36, 284–304.

Madsen, J.M. 2019: Like father like son: the differences in how Dio tells the story of Julius Caesar and his more successful son. In: J. Osgood, C. Baron (eds.), Cassius Dio and the Late Roman Republic. Leiden– Boston, 259–282.

Madsen J.M. 2020: Reconstructing the Principate: Dio and the Flavians. In: C. Burden-Strevens, J.M. Madsen, A. Pistellato (eds.), Cassius Dio and the Principate. Venice, 95–114.

Madsen, J.M. 2022: Cassius Dio and the ideal constitution. In: A.M. Kemezis, C. Bailey, B. Poletti (eds.), The Intellectual Climate of Cassius Dio. Greek and Roman Pasts, Leiden–Boston, 80–108.

Makhlayuk, A.V., Markov, K.V. 2019: Travelogue elements in the narrative structure of Cassius Dio's Roman History. Dialog so vremenem [Dialogue with Time] 69, 46–62.

Махлаюк, А.В., Марков, К.В. Элементы травелога в нарративной структуре «Римской истории» Диона Кассия. Диалог со временем 69, 46–62.

Malik, S. 2021: An emperor’s war on Greece: Cassius Dio’s Nero. In: C. Davenport, C. Mallan (eds.), Emperors and Political Culture in Cassius Dio’s Roman History. Cambridge–New York, 158–176.

Mallan, C. 2014: The rape of Lucretia in Cassius Dio’s Roman History. Classical Quarterly 64/2, 758–771.

Mallan, C. 2016: Parrhesia in Cassius Dio. In: C.H. Lange, J.M. Madsen (eds.), Cassius Dio: Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden–Boston, 258–275.

Mallan, C. 2021a: ‘But he possessed a most singular nature’: Cassius Dio on Tiberius. In: C. Davenport, C. Mallan (eds.), Emperors and Political Culture in Cassius Dio’s Roman History. Cambridge–New York, 133–157.

Mallan, C. 2021b: Dio and his friends: autobiography and biography in Cassius Dio’s contemporary narrative. In: C. Davenport, C. Mallan (eds.), Emperors and Political Culture in Cassius Dio’s Roman History. Cambridge–New York, 265–285.

Markov, K.V. 2008: [Towards the chronology of Cassius Dio’s Roman History]. Vestnik drevney istorii [Journal of Ancient History] 2, 142–154.

Марков, К.В. К вопросу о хронологии работы Диона Кассия над «Римской историей». ВДИ 2, 142–154.

Markov, K.V. 2013: The concepts of ‘democracy’ and ‘tyranny’ in the speech of Agrippa in Cassius Dio 52.1–13: conventional rhetoric or political theory? In: A. Mehl, A.V. Makhlayuk, O.L. Gabelko (eds.), Ruthenia classica aetatis novae: A Collection of Works by Russian Scholars in Greek and Roman History. Stuttgart, 215–231.

Markov, K.V. 2016: Towards the peculiarities of Cassius Dio’s public career in 220s. Vestnik of Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod 3, 57–62.

Markov, K.V. 2019: Towards the conceptualization of Cassius Dio’s narration of the early career of Octavian. In: J. Osgood, C. Baron (eds.), Cassius Dio and the Late Roman Republic. Leiden–Boston, 282–298. Markov, K.V. 2020: Cassius Dio on senatorial activities as a factor of political instability and civil war. In: C. Lange, A. Scott (eds.), Cassius Dio: The Impact of Violence, War, and Civil War. Leiden–Boston, 241–256.

Markov, K.V. 2021: Cassius Dio’s periodization of Roman history and his methodological agendas. In: J. Madsen, C. Lange (eds.), Cassius Dio the Historian. Methods and Approaches. Leiden–Boston, 109–129.

Mastrorosa, I.G. 2014: Octavien à la veille d’Actium chez Dion Cassius (L.24–30): Haranguer les troupes en diffamant l’adversaire. Exercises de rhétorique 3, 1–13.

Mastrorosa, I.G. 2017: Oratory and political debate in the last decades of the Roman Republic: Cassius Dio’s reconstruction (with some notes from Remigio Nannini’s Orationi Militari). In: J.C. IglesiasZoido, V. Pineda (eds.), Anthologies of Historiographical Speeches from Antiquity to Early Modern Times. Rearranging the Tesserae. Leiden–Boston, 319–338.

McKechnie, P. 1981: Cassius Dio’s speech of Agrippa: a realistic alternative to imperial government? Greece & Rome 28/2, 150–155.

Meyer, P. 1891. De Maecenatis oratione a Dione ficta. Diss. Berlin.

Millar, F. 1961: Some speeches in Cassius Dio. Museum Helveticum 18, 11–22.

Millar, F. 1964: A Study of Cassius Dio. Oxford.

Millar, F. 2005: Rome in Greek culture: Cassius Dio and Ulpian. In: L. Troiani, G. Zecchini (eds.), La cultura storica nei primi due secoli dell’impero romano (Milano, 3–5 giugno 2004). Roma, 17–40.

Molin, M. 2016a: Cassius Dion et les empereurs de son temps. Pour une confrontation du manuscrit Vaticanus Graecus 1288 et des autres sources contemporaines. In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. 2 vols. Bordeaux, 259–270.

Molin, M. 2016b: Biographie de l’historien Cassius Dion. In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. 2 vols. Bordeaux, 431–446.

Molin, M. 2016c: Cassius Dion et la société de son temps. In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. 2 vols. Bordeaux, 469–482.

Murison, C.L. 1999: Rebellion and Reconstruction: An Historical Commentary on Cassius Dio’s Roman History Books 64–67 (A.D. 68–96). Oxford.

Noe, C.V. 2020: The ‘Age of Iron and Rust’ in Cassius Dio’s Roman History: influences from stoic philosophy. In: C. Burden-Strevens, J.M. Madsen, A. Pistellato (eds.), Cassius Dio and the Principate. Venice, 141–164.

Osgood, J. 2020: “If you do wrong, you will be king!”: the civil war victor in Cassius Dio. In: C. Lange, A. Scott (eds.), Cassius Dio: The Impact of Violence, War, and Civil War. Leiden–Boston, 313–389.

Pelling, C.B.R. 1997: Biographical history? Cassius Dio on the early Principate. In: M.J. Edwards, S. Swain (eds.), Portraits: Biographical Representation in the Greek and Latin Literature of the Roman Empire. Oxford, 117–144.

Pelling, C.B.R. 2021: Epilogue: and now . . . ? In: C. Davenport, C. Mallan (eds.), Emperors and Political Culture in Cassius Dio’s Roman History. Cambridge–New York, 308–320.

Pistellato, A. 2020: Δηµοκρατεῖσθαι or µοναρχεῖσθαι, that is the question: Cassius Dio and the senatorial principate. In: C. Burden-Strevens, J.M. Madsen, A. Pistellato (eds.), Cassius Dio and the Principate. Venice, 115–140.

Platon, M. 2016: Sénat et pouvoir impérial dans les livres 57 et 58 de l’Histoire romaine de Cassius Dion Rome et son empire. In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. 2 vols. Bordeaux, 653–678.

Questa, C. 1957: Tecnica biographica e tecnica annalistica nei libri LIII–LXIII di Cassio Dione. Studi Urbinati di Storia 31, 37–53.

Rantala, J. 2016: Dio the dissident: the portrait of Severus in the Roman History. In: C.H. Lange, J.M. Madsen (eds.), Cassius Dio: Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden–Boston, 159–176.

Reardon, B.P. 1971: Courants littéraires grecs des IIe et IIIe siècles après J.-C. Paris.

Rees, W. 2011: Cassius Dio, Human Nature, and the Late Roman Republic. PhD thesis. Oxford.

Reinhold, M. 1988: From Republic to Principate: An Historical Commentary on Cassius Dio’s Roman History, Books 49–52 (36–29 BC). Atlanta.

Rich, J.W. 1989: Dio on Augustus. In: A. Cameron (ed.), History as Text: The Writing of Ancient History. London, 86–110.

Rich, J.W. 1990: Cassius Dio, The Augustan Settlement (Roman History 53–55.9). Warminster.

Rich, J.W. 2016: Annalistic organization and book division in Dio’s Books 1–35. In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. 2 vols. Bordeaux, 271–286.

Rich, J.W. 2019: Speech in Cassius Dio’s Roman History, books 1–35. In: C. Burden-Strevens, M. Lindholmer, (eds.), Cassius Dio’s Forgotten History of Early Rome. Leiden–Boston, 217–284.

Rich, J.W. 2020: Appian, Cassius Dio and Seneca the Elder. In: M.C. Scappaticcio (ed.), Seneca the Elder and his Rediscovered ‘Historiae ab initio bellorum civilium’: New Perspectives on Early-Imperial Roman Histori ography. Berlin–Boston, 329–354.

Roberto, U. 2010: Aspetti della riflessione sul governo misto nel pensiero politico romano da Cicerone all’età di Giustiniano. Montesquieu.it 2, 43–78. (URL: https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2421-4124/5134; accessed on 23.11.2022).

Rodgers, B.S. 2008: Catulus’ speech in Cassius Dio 36.31–36. Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 48/3, 295–318.

Rodrigues, N.S. 2021: El agôn constitucial en Dion Casio 52: Récorrido de un tópico historiográfico en la biografía de Augusto. In: O. Devillers, B.B. Sebastiani (eds.), Sources et modèles des historiens anciens. Bordeaux, 357–366.

Schettino, M.T. 2001: Cassio Dione e le guerre civili di età severiana. Gerion 19, 533–558.

Schmidt, M.G. 1997: Die ‘zeitgeschichtlichen’ Bücher im Werke des Cassius Dio: Von Commodus zu Severus Alexander. Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II.34/3, 2591–2649.

Schulz, V. 2016: Historiography and panegyric: the deconstruction of imperial representation in Cassius Dio’s Roman History. In: C.H. Lange, J.M. Madsen (eds.), Cassius Dio: Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden–Boston, 276–296.

Schulz, V. 2019a: Defining the good ruler: early kings as proto-imperial figures in Cassius Dio. In: C. BurdenStrevens, M. Lindholmer (eds.), Cassius Dio’s Forgotten History of Early Rome. Leiden–Boston, 311–332.

Schulz, V. 2019b: Deconstructing Imperial Representation: Tacitus, Cassius Dio, and Suetonius on Nero and Domitian. Leiden–Boston.

Schwartz, Ed. 1899: Cassius Dio. RE. Hlbd. 3, 1684–1722.

Scott, A.G. 2015: Cassius Dio, Caracalla, and the senate. Klio 97, 157–175.

Scott, A.G. 2018: Cassius Dio’s contemporary history as memoir and its implications for authorial identity. Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar 17, 1–23.

Scott, A.G. 2020a: Civil war and governmental change: from the achievements of Augustus to the failures of the Severans. In: C.H. Lange, A.G. Scott (eds.), Cassius Dio: The Impact of Violence, War, and Civil War. Leiden–Boston, 334–355.

Scott, A.G. 2020b: Misunderstanding history: past and present in Cassius Dio’s contemporary books. In: C. Burden-Strevens, J.M. Madsen, A. Pistellato (eds.), Cassius Dio and the Principate. Venice, 165–188.

Sidebottom, H. 2007: Severan historiography: evidence, patterns, and arguments. In: S. Swain, S. Harrison, J. Elsner (eds.), Severan Culture. Cambridge, 52–82.

Simon, M. 2016: L’épisode de Sentinum chez Zonaras à la lumière du parallèle livien. In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. 2 vols. Bordeaux, 205–214.

Simons, B. 2009: Cassius Dio und die Römische Republik. Untersuchungen zum Bild des römischen Gemeinwesens in den Büchern 3–35 der „Rhomaika“. Berlin–New York.

Simons, B. 2012: Cassius Dio und die Katastrophen von 9. n.Chr. und 53 v.Chr. Gymnasium 119/6, 571–596.

Simons, B. 2014: Cassius Dio und der Germanenfeldzug Caracallas von 213 n. Chr. Gymnasium 121, 263–283.

Smyshlyayev, A.L. 1990: [The speech of Maecenas (Dio Cass. LII, 14–40): problems of interpretation”]. Vestnik drevney istorii [Journal of Ancient History] 1, 54–66.

Смышляев, А.Л. «Речь Мецената» (Dio Cass. LII, 14–40): проблемы интерпретации. ВДИ 1, 54–66.

Smyshlyaev, A.L. 1991: Maecenas’ speech (Dio Cass. LII.14–40): problems of interpretation. Acta Universitatis Carolinae – Philologica 2 Graecolatina Pragensia 13, 137–155.

Sordi, M. 2000: Le date di composizione dell’opera di Dione Cassio. Papyrologica Lupiensia 9, 391–396.

Swan, P.M. 1997: How Cassius Dio composed his Augustan books: four studies. Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II.34/3, 2524–2557.

Urso, G. 2020: ‘Ritorno alla monarchia’, tra Cesare e Augusto: le origini del principato in Cassio Dione. In: C. Burden-Strevens, J.M. Madsen, A. Pistellato (eds.), Cassius Dio and the Principate. Venice, 19–38.

Van Stekelenburg, A.V. 1971: De redevoeringen bij Cassius Dio. PhD thesis. Leiden.

Vrind, G. 1923: De Cassii Dionis vocabulis quae ad ius publicum pertinent. PhD thesis. The Hague.

Zawadzki, R. 1983: Konzeption der römischen Staatsverfassung in der politischen Doktrin des Cassius Dio. Zur Interpretation des LII. Buches der Römischen Geschichte von Cassius Dio. Analecta Cracoviensia 15, 271–318.

Zecchini, G. 2016: Cassius Dion et l’historiographie de son temps. In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nou velles lectures. 2 vols. Bordeaux, 113–124.