The article offers a reconstruction of the political position of the popes in the Arian controversy of the 4th century. Conversion of Constantine and the christianization of the Empire in the 4th century posed a difficult question about the place of the Christian emperor in the Church and his relationship with the episcopate. During the Arian crisis Roman bishops showed relative independence in relation to the imperial power, which can be explained by a certain distance of Rome from the imperial courts. At the same time, such autonomy could lead to tragic consequences, as it was attested, for example, by the so-called “fall” of Pope Liberius. Despite the fact that the Roman see developed the idea of Rome as a “city of saints”, relying more on the city-state republican than the imperial tradition, Roman bishops used elements of the imperial discourse in developing the idea of the Roman primacy and sought its recognition by the imperial power.
Сorti, G. 2004: Lucifero di Cagliari. Una voce nel conflitto tra chiesa e impero alla metà del IV secolo. Milano.
Diefenbach, S. 2007: Römische Erinnerungsräume. Heiligenmemoria und kollektive Identitäten im Rom des 3. bis 5. Jahrhunderts n. Chr. Berlin–New York.
Dvornik, F. 1964: Byzance et la primauté romaine. Paris.
Field, L.L. 1998: Liberty, Dominion, and the Two Swords: On the Origins of Western Political Theology (180– 398). University of Notre Dame.
Flower, R. 2013: Emperors and Bishops in Late Roman Invective. Cambridge.
Girardet, K.M. 1994: Gericht über den Bischof von Rom. Historische Zeitschrift 259, 1–38.
Just, P. 2003: Imperator et Episcopus. Zum Verhältnis von Staatsgewalt und christlicher Kirche zwischen dem 1. Konzil von Nicaea (325) und dem 1. Konzil von Konstantinopel (381). Stuttgart.
King, N.Q. 1961: The Emperor Theodosius and the Establishment of Christianity. London.
Koptev, A.V. 1996: [Princeps et dominus: to the question of the evolution of the principate at the beginning of the Late Antiquity]. Drevnee pravo [Ius Antiquum] 1, 182–190.
Коптев, А.В. 1996: Princeps et dominus: к вопросу об эволюции принципата в начале позднеантичной эпохи. Древнее право 1, 182–190.
Löx, M. 2013: Monumenta sanctorum: Rom und Mailand als Zentren des frühen Christentums: Märtyrerkult und Kirchenbau unter den Bischöfen Damasus und Ambrosius. Wiesbaden.
Messana, V. 1999: La politica religiosa di Graziano. Roma.
Pietri, Ch. 1976: Roma Christiana. Recherches sur l’Église de Rome, son organisation, sa politique, son idéologie de Miltiade à Sixte III (311–440). Rome.
Pietri, Ch. 1997: Damase et Théodose: communion orthodoxe et géographie politique. In: Ch. Pietri, Christiana respublica. Éléments d’une enquête sur le christianisme antique. Vol. I. Rome, 347–354.
Reutter, U. 2009: Damasus, Bischof von Rom (366–384). Leben und Werk. Tübingen.
Sághy, M. 2015: The bishop of Rome and the martyrs. In: G.D. Dunn (ed), The Bishop of Rome in Late Antiquity. Farnham–Burlington, 37–55.
Schatz, K. 1992: La primauté du Pape. Son histoire, des origines à nos jours. Paris.
Twomey, V. 1982: Apostolikos Thronos: The Primacy of Rome as Reflected in the Church History of Eusebius and the Historico-Apologetical Writings of Saint Athanasius the Great. Münster.
Zakharov, G.E. 2015: [“Apostolic” and “imperial” discourse in the development of the Roman Primacy in the 4th century]. Vestnik PSTGU. Seriya II [St. Tikhon’s University Review. Series II], 4 (65), 9–26.
Захаров, Г.Е. «Апостольский» и «имперский» дискурс в развитии идеи римского первенства в IV в. Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия II, 4(65), 9–26.
Zakharov, G.E. 2016: [Pope Liberius as participant of the Arian controversy]. In: G.E. Zakharov (ed.), Bozhestvennaya vlast', tserkovnaya ierarkhiya i dukhovnyy avtoritet v rannekhristianskoy latinskoy traditsii [The Divine Power, Church Hierarchy and Spiritual Authority in the Early Latin Christianity]. Moscow, 31–73.
Захаров, Г.Е. 2016: Папа Либерий как участник арианских споров. В сб.: Г.Е. Захаров (ред.), Божественная власть, церковная иерархия и духовный авторитет в раннехристианской латинской традиции. Москва, 31–73.