Why Crassus Hated Cicero (Plut. Crass. 13. 3–5)?

Lyubimova Olga V.

The article deals with the statement of Plutarch (Crass. 13. 5), according to which Crassus began to hate Cicero after receiving the anonymous letters warning about the Catiline conspiracy. The letters were delivered to Crassus under strange circumstances, transferred by him to Cicero and gave grounds for the passing of the senatus consultum ultimum. The hypothesis proposed here is that Crassus considered Cicero himself to be the author of the letters, and regarded the whole episode as his provocation with the aim of driving a wedge between Crassus and the conspirators and getting extraordinary powers from the senate.

Keywords: Crassus, Ciciero, Catiline conspiracy, senates consultum ultimum, anonymous letters, the Late Roman Republic
References:

Batstone, W. W. 1986: Incerta pro certis: an interpretation of Sallust Bellum Catilinae 48.4–49.4. Ramus 15, 105–121.

Bertinelli, M.G. 1993: A. Commento. La vita di Crasso. In: M.G.A. Bertinelli, C. Carena, M. Manfredini, L. Piccitilli (a cura di), Plutarco. Le vita di Nicio et di Crasso. Milano.

Bonnefond-Coudry, M. 1989: Le sénat de la Republique Romaine de la guerre d’Hannibal à Auguste: pratiques délibératives et prise de décision. Paris.

Broughton, T.R.S. 1951: The Magistrates of the Roman Republic. Vol. 2. New York.

Brunt, P. 1957: Three Passages from Asconius. The Classical Review. N.s. 7, 193–195.

Brunt, P. 1988: The Fall of the Roman Republic and Related Essays. Oxford.

Bugaeva, N.V. 2005: Uchastie postradavshikh ot sullanskikh konfiskatsiy v zagovore Katiliny [The participation of victims of Sullan confiscations in the conspiracy of Catiline]. Antiquitas iuventae 1. Saratov, 91–95. 

Бугаева, Н.В. Участие пострадавших от сулланских конфискаций в заговоре Катилины. Antiquitas iuventae 1. Саратов, 91–95.

Cadoux, T.J. 2006: The Absent Senator of 5 December 63 B.C. The Classical Quarterly 56, 612–618.

Deknatel, C. 1901: De vita M. Licinii Crassi. Lugduni Batavorum.

Cary, E. (tr.) 1914: Dio’s Roman History. Vol. 3. London–New York.

Fezzi, L. 2010: Documenti e falsi documentari nel I sec. A.C.: il caso della congiura di Catilina. In: P. Castelli, S. Geruzzi (a cura di), Prima e dopo le Tavole Eugubine: falsi e copie fra tradizione antiquaria e rivisitazioni dell’antico. Pisa, 87–95.

Frisch, H. 1948: The First Catilinarian Conspiracy. A Study in Historical Conjecture. Classica et Mediaevalia 9, 10–36.

Garzetti, A.M. 1996: Scritti di storia repubblicana e augustea. Roma.

Gelzer, M. 1926: Licinius (68). In: W. Kroll (ed.), RE. Hlbd. 25, 295–331

Grethlein, J. 2006: The Unthucydidean Voice of Sallust. Transactions of the American Philological Association 136, 299–327

Gruen, E. 1974: The Last Generation of the Roman Republic. Berkeley–Los Angeles–London.

Hardy, E. 1916: A Catilinarian Date. The Journal of Roman Studies 6, 56–58.

Heitland, W.E. 1909: The Roman Republic. Vol. 3. Cambridge.

Holmes, T.R. 1918: Three Catilinarian Dates. The Journal of Roman Studies 8, 15–25.

Holmes, T.R. 1923: The Roman Republic and the Founder of the Empire. Oxford.

John, C. 1888: Der Tag der Ersten Rede Ciceros gegen Catilina. Philologus 46, 650–665. 

Levick, B. 2015: Catiline. London.

Linderski, J. 1996: Q. Scipio Imperator. In: J. Linderski (ed.), Imperium Sine Fine: T. Robert S. Broughton and the Roman Republic. Stuttgart, 145–185.

Lyubimova, O.V. 2013: Brachnye soyuzy kak instrument politiki v epokhu Pozdney rimskoy respubliki: sem’ya triumvira Krassa [Marriage Unions as a Political Instrument in the Late Roman Republic (1st Century B.C.): the Family of Crassus the Triumvir]. Izvestiya Ural’skogo federal’nogo universiteta. Ser. 2. Gumanitarnye nauki [Ural Federal University Journal. Series 2. Humanities and Arts] 3 (117), 22–37. 

Любимова, О.В. Брачные союзы как инструмент политики в эпоху Поздней римской республики: семья триумвира Красса. Известия УрФУ. Сер. 2. Гуманитарные науки 3 (117), 22–37.

Marshall, B. 1974: Cicero and Sallust on Crassus and Catiline. Latomus 33, 804–813.

Marshall, B. 1976: Crassus: a Political Biography. Amsterdam.

Moles, J. 1982: Plutarch, Crassus 13, 4–5, and Cicero’s de consiliis suisLiverpool Classical Monthly 7, 136–137.

Pelling, C. 1985: Plutarch and Catiline. Hermes 113, 311–329.

Plutarch 1963: Sravnitel’nye zhizneopisaniya. T. 2 [Lives. Vol. 2]. Мoskva. 

Плутарх. Сравнительные жизнеописания. Т. 2. М.

Piegdoń, M. 2014: Krassus: Polityk Niespełnionych Ambicji. Kraków.

Potter, F.H. 1925: The Date of Cicero’s First Oration against Catiline. The Classical Journal 21, 164–176.

Ramsey, J. 2007: Sallust’s Bellum Catilinae. Oxford.

Rawson, B. 1991: Roman Culture and Society. Oxford. 

Salmon, E. T. 1935: Catiline, Crassus, and Caesar. The American Journal of Philology 56, 302–316.

Santangelo, F. 2007: Sulla, Elites and the Empire. A Study of Roman Policies in Italy and the Greek East. Leiden–Boston.

Schäfer, H. 1830 (ed.): Plutarchi Vitae. Vol. 5. Lipsae.641 

Seager, R. 1964: The First Catilinarian Conspiracy. Historia 13, 338–347. 

Seager, R. 1973: Iusta Catilinae. Historia 22, 240–248. 

Stern, E. 1883: Catilina und die Parteikämpfe in Rom der Jahre 66–63. Dorpat. 

Stewart, R. 1995: Catiline and the Crisis of 63–60 B.C.: the Italian Perspective. Latomus 54, 62–78. 

Stockton, D. 1971: Cicero. A Political Biography. Oxford. 

Stone, M. 1999: Tribute to a Statesman: Cicero and Sallust. Antichthon 33, 48–76. 

Syme, R. 1964: Sallust. Berkeley–Los Angeles–London. 

Todd, O. J. 1952: Dates in the Autumn of 63 B.C. In: M.E. White (ed.), Studies in Honour of Gilbert Norwood. Toronto, 156–162. 

Yavetz, Z.1963: The Failure of Catiline’s Conspiracy. Historia. 12, 485–499. 

Ward, A. 1977: Marcus Crassus and the Late Roman Republic. Columbia; London. 

Waters, K. H. 1970: Cicero, Sallust and Catiline. Historia. 19, 195–215. 

Wiseman, T. P. 1994: The Senate and the Populares, 69–60 B.C. In: J.A. Crook, A. Lintott, E. Rawson (eds), The Cambridge Ancient History. 2nd ed. Vol. 9. Cambridge, 326–367.