Political Sense and Poetical Structure of Euripides’ Andromache

Nikolsky Boris M.

The paper contests a traditional view of Euripides’ Andromache as of a tragedy without inner unity. Its unity is to be seen in parallelism and contrasts of its episodes developing several constant themes, the most important of them being enmity and marriage. The meaning and the place of these themes in the dramatic structure becomes more apparent if one assumes that their sense was rather symbolic than direct and reflected the contemporary political events. Production of Andromache could have been connected with the peace treaty between Athens and the Molossians in the early 20s of the 5th century BC.

Keywords: Tragedy, structure, motif, enmity, marriage, barbarians, Peloponnesian war, Athens, Sparta, Molossians.
References:
  1. Allan W. 2000: The Andromache and Euripidean Tragedy. Oxf.
  2. Bornmann F. (ed.) 1962: Euripidis Andromacha. Firenze.
  3. Cairns D. 1996: Veiling, Aidôs, and a Red-figure Amphora by Phintias // 116, 152–157.
  4. Conacher D.J. 1967: Euripidean Drama: Myth, Theme and Structure. Toronto.
  5. Dakaris S.I. 1964: Οἱ γεννεαλογικοὶ μῦθοι τῶν Μολοσσῶν. Αθῆναι.
  6. Diggle J. (ed.) 1984: Euripidis Fabulae. Vol. 2. Oxf.
  7. Dover K.J. 1974: Greek Popular Morality in the Time of Plato and Aristotle. Oxf.
  8. Goossens R. 1962: Euripide et Athè Bruxelles.
  9. Hall E. 1989: Inventing the Barbarian. Oxf.
  10. Hammond N.G.L. 1967: Epirus. Oxf.
  11. Hammond N.G.L. 1982: Illyris, Epirus and Macedonia // CAH. Vol. 3. Part 3 / J. Boardman, N.G.L. Hammond (eds.). Cambr., 261–285.
  12. Kamerbeek J.C. 1943: L'Andromaque d'Euripide // Mnemosyne. 11, 47–67.
  13. Kitto H.D.F. 1961: Greek Tragedy. 3rd L.
  14. Kovacs P.D. 1980: The Andromache of Euripides: An Interpretation. Chico (CA).
  15. Kovacs P.D. 1987: The Heroic Muse. Baltimore.
  16. Lee K.H. 1975: Euripides’ Andromache: Observations on Form and Meaning // Antichthon. 9, 4–16.
  17. Lucas D.W. 1959: The Greek Tragic Poets. 2nd L.
  18. Mastronarde D. 1979: Contact and Discontinuity. Some Conventions of Speech and Action on the Greek Tragic Stage. Berkeley.
  19. Nikolsky B. 2014 (forthcoming): Human Misery and Forgiveness: Meaning and Structure in Euripides' Hippolytus. Swansea.
  20. Osborne M.J. 1983: Naturalization in Athens. Vols. 3–4. Brussels.
  21. Rivier A. 1975: Essai sur le tragique d'Euripide. 2ème éd. P.
  22. Robertson D.S. 1923: Euripides and Tharyps // CR. 37, 58–60.
  23. Stevens P.T. 1971 (ed.): Euripides’ Andromache. Oxf.
  24. Storey I.C. 1989: Domestic Disharmony in Euripides’ Andromache // Greece and Rome. 36, 16–27.