Sallust in the Context of Ancient Historiography

Korolenkov Anton V., Nikishin Vladimir О.

References:

Adler, E. 2006: Who’s Anti-Roman? Sallust and Pompeius Trogus on Mithridates. Classical Journal 101. 4, 383–407.

Adler, E. 2011: Valorizing the Barbarians: Enemy Speeches in Roman Historiography. Austin.

Büchner, K. 1953: Der Aufbau von Sallusts Bellum Iugurthinum. Wiesbaden.

Büchner, K. 1982: Sallust. Heidelberg.

Chlup, J. Th. 2004: Beyond the Foreigner: Representations of non-Roman individuals and communities in Latin historiography, from Sallust to Ammianus Marcellinus. Diss. Ph. D. Durham.

Chlup, J. Th. 2013: Sallust’s Melian Dialogue: Sulla and Bocchus in the Bellum Iugurthinum. Dialogues d’Histoire Ancienne 8, 191–207.

Egorov, A.B. 1979: [Political Ideas of Sallust]. In: Antichnyy polis [Ancient polis]. Leningrad, 101–124. 

Egorov, A.B. 2015: [Thucydides and Sallust (Comparative Analysis)]. In: Mnemon. Issue 15. Saint Petersburg, 219–242. 

Gerrish, J. 2012: Sallust’s Histories and Triumviral Historiography. Diss. Ph.D. [Philadelphia].

Heldmann, K. 1993: Sallust über die römische Weltherrschaft. Eine Geschichtsmodell in ‘Catilina’ und seine Tradition in der hellenistischen Historiographie. Stuttgart.

Kapust, D.J. 2011: Republicanism, Rhetoric, and Roman Political Thought: Sallust, Livy, and Tacitus. Cambridge–New York.

Korolenkov, A.V. 2009: [On an Interpretation of the Mithridate’s Letter in Sallust Historiae]. In: Politika, ideologiya, istoriopisanie v rimsko-elli nis ticheskom mire [Politics, Ideology, and Writing of History in the Roman and Hellenistic World]. Kazan, 109–116. 

McGing, B.C. 1986: The Foreign Policy of Mithradates VI Eupator King of Pontus. Leiden.

Papaioannou, S. 2014: Matrices of Time and the Recycling of Evil in Sallust’s Historiography. Epekeina 4. 1–2, 113–139.

Ramsey, J.T. 2007: Sallust’s ‘Bellum Catilinae’. Oxford.

Zarecki, J.P. 2012: [Rev.] Daniel J. Kapust, Republicanism, Rhetoric, and Roman Political Thought: Sallust, Livy, and Tacitus. Cambridge; New York, 2011. Bryn Mawr Classical Review 2012.07.29.