War Propaganda in Euripides’ Trojan Women
Nikolsky Boris M.
The article disputes the commonly accepted treatment of Euripides’ Trojan Women as an antiwar tragedy written under the impression of the cruelty shown by the Athenians during the capture of Melos. First, the analysis of the dramatic structure and imagery of the play shows that its main theme is not so much the conquerors’ cruelty itself as the inevitability of the Achaeans’ retribution for the crimes committed by them against the Trojans. Second, the paper investigates the references to the then current political situation contained in the play and offers a guess that the myth about the guilt of the “Dorian” Achaeans before the Trojans and the punishment awaiting them was used by Euripides for propaganda of military assistance to the residents of the Sicilian city of Egesta, who traced themselves to the Trojans, against the Dorian cities of Selinus and Syracuse.
References:
Barlow, Sh. 1971: The Imagery of Euripides: A Study in the Dramatic Use of Pictorial Language. New York.
Barlow, Sh. (ed.) 1984: Euripides. Trojan Women. Warminster.
Brillet-Dubois, P. 2015: A Competition of choregoi in Euripides' Trojan Women. Dramatic Structure and Intertextuality. Lexis 33, 168–180.
Bowra, C.M. 1960: Euripides’ Epinician for Alcibiades. Historia 9, 68–79.
Conacher, D.J. 1967: Euripidean Drama: Myth, Theme and Structure. Toronto.
Diggle, J. (ed.) 1981: Euripidis fabulae. T. 2. Oxford.
Dover, K. 2001: Who Was To Blame? In: Stuttard, Shasha (eds) 2001, 1–9.
Dunn, F.M. 1993: Beginning at the End in Euripides' Trojan Women. Rheinisches Museum 136, 22–35.
Erp Taalman Kip, A. Maria van 1987: Euripides and Melos. Mnemosyne 40, 414–419.
Gantz, T.N. 1977: The Fires in the Oresteia. Journal of Hellenic Studies 97, 28–38.
Garvie, A. 2001: Euripides' Trojan Women: Relevance and Universality. In: Stuttard, Shasha (eds) 2001, 45–60.
Grégoire, H. 1933: Euripide, Ulysse et Alcibiade. Bulletin de la Classe des Lettres et des Sciences morales et politiques de l’Académie royale de Belgique, 5e série, 21, 83–106.
Griffin, J. 2001: The Trojan Women. In: Stuttard, Shasha (eds) 2001, 61–72.
Jebb, R. (ed.) 1894: Sophocles. Philoctetes. Cambridge.
Kennedy, R.F. 2009: Athena’s Justice. Athena, Athens and the Concept of Justice in Greek Tragedy. New York.
Koniaris, G.L. 1973: Alexander, Palamedes, Troades, Sisyphus – A Connected Tetralogy? A Connected Trilogy? Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 77, 85–124.
Lebeck, A. 1971: The Oresteia: A Study in Language and Structure. Washington, D.C.
Lee, K.H. (ed.) 1976: Euripides. Troades. London.
Luria, S.Ya. 1993: Istoriya Gretsii [History of Greece]. Saint Petersburg.
Лурье, С.Я. 1993: История Греции. СПб.
Luschnig, C. 1971: Euripides’ Trojan Women: All Is Vanity. Classical World 65, 8–12.
Nikolsky, B. 2015: Misery and Forgiveness in Euripides: Meaning and Structure in the Hippolytus. Swansea.
O’Neill Jr., E. 1941: The Prologue of the Troades of Euripides. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 72, 288–320.
Paganelli, L. 1979: Echi storico-politici nel Ciclope euripideo. Padua.
Paley, F.A. (ed.) 1857: Euripides. Vol. 1. London.
Peradotto, J.J. 1964: Some Patterns of Nature Imagery in the Oresteia. American Journal of Philology 85, 378–393.
Quint, D. 2010: Aeacidae Pyrri: Patterns of Myth and History in Aeneid 1–6. In: B. Breed, C. Damon, A. Rossi (eds), Citizens of Discord: Rome and Its Civil Wars. Oxford, 133–144.
Seaford, R. (ed.) 1984: Euripides. Cyclops. Oxford.
Sommerstein, A. 1997: Audience, Demos, and Aeschylus’ Suppliants. In: Ch. Pelling (ed.), Greek Tragedy and the Historian. Oxford, 63–79.
Stuttard, D., Shasha, T. (eds) 2001: Essays on Trojan Women. London.
Westlake, H. 1953: Euripides' Troades: 205–29. Mnemosyne 6, 181–191.
Wilamowitz-Moellendorf, U. von (übers.) 1906: Griechische Tragoedien. Zweite Auflage. Bd. 3. Berlin.
Yarkho, V.N. 1999: Evripid. Tragedii. T. 1 [Euripides. Tragedies. Vol. 1]. Moscow.
Ярхо, В.Н. (изд.) 1999: Еврипид. Трагедии в двух томах. Т. 1. М.