Magic in the Late Roman Imperial Legislation

Marey Alexandr V.

The author analyses the evolution of the idea of magic reflected in the decrees of Christian Roman Emperors included in the Theodosian Code. He describes the place of the chapter De maleficis in the structure of Book IX of the Theodosian Code and analyses its constitutions. Special attention is paid to the possible sources of the norms described and to the connection between the evolution of Christianity and the tightening of anti-magic legislation.

Keywords: Theodosian Code, magic, prophecy, astrology, necromancy, Book of Daniel, Book of Deuteronomy
References:
  1. Koptev, A. (1996). Kodifikacija Feodosija II i ee predposylki. // Drevnee pravo. IUS ANTIQUUM. 4, 247-261.
  2. Silvestrova, E. (2007). Lex Generalis. Imperatorskaja konstitucija v sisteme istochnikov greko-rimskogo prava V – X vv. n.je. M.: Indrik.
  3. Sacrilegium. (1920). // RE (col.1678-1681). Stutgart.
  4. Ager, B. (2010). Roman Agricultural Magic: a Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Classical Studies). Michigan.
  5. Barb, A. (1963). The Survival of Magic Arts. // AA.VV., The Conflict between Paganism and Christianity in the Fourth Century (стр. 100-125). Oxford.
  6. Castello, C. (1990). Cenni sulla repressione del reato di magia dagli inizi del principato fino a Costanzo II.// Atti Dell'Accademia romanistica constantiniana. Convegno internazionale, 665-694.
  7. Cuneo, P. (1997). La legislazione di Constantino II, Costanzo II e Constante (337 - 361). Milano.
  8. Desanti, L. (1990). Sileat omnibus perpetuo divinandi curiositas. Indovini e sanzioni nel diritto romano. Milano.
  9. Dupont, C. (1953). Le Droit criminel dans les constitutions de Constantin. Les infractions. Lille.
  10. Harries, J. (2001). Law and Empire in Late Antiquity. Cambridge.
  11. Harries, J. (2007). Law and Crime in the Roman World. Cambridge.
  12. Harries, J., & Wood, I. (ed.). (1993). The Theodosian Code. Studies in the Imperial Law of Late Antiquity. London.
  13. Honore, T. (1998). Law in the crisis of Empire: 379 – 455 AD. The Theodosian Dinasty and its Quaestors. With a Palingenesia of Laws of the Dinasty. Oxford.
  14. Loomis, C. (1948). White Magic. An Introduction to the Folklore of Christian Legend. Cambridge, Massachusets.
  15. Maurice, J. (1927). La terreur de la magie en IVe siècle. // RHDFE (4.06), 108-119.
  16. Millard, A. (1977). Daniel 1-6 and History. // Evangelical Quaterly, 49(2), 67-73.
  17. Mommsen, T. (1907). Le Droit pénal romain. (Т. II). (J. Duquesne, trad.) Paris.
  18. Montero Herrero, S. (1991). Politica y adivinación en el Bajo Imperio Romano: emperadores y haruspices (193 D.C. - 408 D.C.). Bruxelles.
  19. Nogrady, A. (2006). Römisches Strafrecht nach Ulpian: Buch 7 bis 9 De officio proconsulis. Berlin.
  20. Pellechi, L. (2010). L'accusa contro Apuleio: linee retoriche e giuridiche. // AA.VV., Eparcheia, autonomia e civitas Romana. Studi sulla giuridizione criminale dei governatori di provincia (II sec. a.C. - II d.C.) (стр. 171-334). Pavia.
  21. Pergami, F. (1993). La legislazione di Valentiniano y Valente (364 - 375). Milano.
  22. Pergami, F. (2000). L'appello nella legislazione del Tardo Impero. Milano.
  23. Pergami, F. (2007). Accusatio-inquisitio: ancora a proposito della struttura del proccesso criminale in eta tardoantica. // Atti Dell'Accademia romanistica constantiniana. Convegno internazionale. In onore di Manuel J. Garcia Garrido, 595-608.
  24. Pergami, F. (2007). Amministrazione della giustizia e interventi imperiali nel sistema processuale della tarda Antichità. Milano.
  25. Pharr, C. (1932). The Interdiction of Magic in Roman Law. // Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association, 63, 269-295.
  26. Pietrini, S. (1996). Sull`iniziativa del processo criminale romano (IV-V ss). Milano.
  27. Rives, J. (2003). Magic in Roman Law: the Reconstruction of a Crime. // Classical Antiquity, 313-339.
  28. Robinson, O. (1995). The Criminal Law of Ancient Rome. Baltimore, Maryland.
  29. Rodríguez Alvarez, L. (1991). Nueva aproximación al tema del "veneficium". // Labeo, 37, 305-338.
  30. Sánchez-Moreno Ellart, C. (2009). Ulpian and the stars. The actio iniuriarum against the astrologer: some reflections about D.47.10.15.13 (Ulp. lib.77 ad edictum). // Iuris antique historia. An international journal on ancient law, 195-222.
  31. Van der Toorn, K. (2001). Scholars at the Oriental Court: the Figure of Daniel against its Mesopotamian background. // J. Collins, & P. Flint (ed.), The Book of Daniel: composition and reception (p. 37-54). Leiden–Boston.