Muškēnum According to the Data of the Texts from Mari

Alexandrov Boris E.

The question of the meaning of the term in the Old Babylonian Mesopotamia has a long history and remains under discussion. The texts from Mari are of great importance for the studies on this term, as they provide a great number of its occurrences (approximately 130 in 100 documents). The materials from Mari do not support a view that muškēnum denotes tenants of crown land. In most cases it is a designation of common citizens belonging to the communities as opposed to the state sector of socio-economic structure. The use of the term to qualify the dependant low rank personnel of the palace is quite rare. Since originally the word muškēnum had semantics of submission and dependence, even high-ranking persons can be called muškēnum when opposed to the king as supreme ruler of the land. The article has two supplements. The first one provides references to the attestations of the word muškēnum in the Mari corpus. The second one focuses on the analysis of its orthographic variants (with cuneiform signs UŠ and ÚŠ in the second position). One may note a relatively high percentаge of occurrences with UŠ-sign, which was probably pronounced /us/. This leads to a discussion on possible reinterpretation of the word in Mari Akkadian where it may have been also connected with the root SKN ‘to dwell’.

Keywords: Mari, Old Babylonian period, muškēnum, awīlum, state sector
References:
  1. Ardzinba V.G. 1982: Ritual i mify drevnej Anatolii. M.
  2. Gribov R.A. 1970: Zemel'nye otnoshenija v Mari // VDI. 2, 31–40.
  3. Dyakonov I.M. 1956: Muškênum i povinnostnoe zemlevladenie na carskoj zemle pri Hammurabi // Eos. Commentarii Societatis Philologae Polonorum. Vol. 48. Fasc. 1, 37–62.
  4. Dyakonov I.M. 1973: Raby, iloty i krepostnye v rannej drevnosti // VDI. 4, 3–29.
  5. Kozyreva N.V. 1999: Obshhestvennyj trud v drevnej Mesopotamii // Podati i povinnosti na Drevnem Vostoke. SPb., 34–53.
  6. Birot M. 1980: Fragment de rituel de Mari relatif au kispum // Death in Mesopotamia. Papers read at the XXVIe Rencontre assyriologique internationale / B. Alster (ed.). Copenhagen (Mesopotamia. Copenhagen Studies in Assyriology. 8.), 139–150.
  7. Buccellati G. 1991: A Note on the muškēnum as a ‘Homesteader’ // Maarav. Vol. 7, 91–100.
  8. Charpin D. 1993: Un souverain éphémère en Ida-Maraṣ // MARI. 7, 165–203.
  9. Charpin D. 1993–1994: Compte rendu du CAD S // Archiv für Orientforschung. Bd 40–41, 1–23.
  10. Charpin D. 1996: Maisons et maisonnées en Babylonie de Sippar à Ur. Remarques sur les grandes demeures des notables paléo-babyloniens // Houses and Households in Ancient Mesopotamia. Papers Read at the 40th Rencontre Assyriologique Internationale Leiden, July 5–8, 1993 / K.R. Veenhof (ed.). Leiden (PIHANS. 78), 221–228.
  11. Charpin D. 2003: Hammu-rabi de Babylone. P.
  12. Charpin D. 2010: Un nouveau «protocole de serment» de Mari // Opening the Tablet Box. Near Eastern Studies in Honor of Benjamin R. Foster / S.C. Melville, A.L. Slotsky (eds.). Leiden–Boston, 49–75.
  13. Charpin D., Durand J.-M. 2003: Des volontaires contre l’Élam // Literatur, Politik und Recht in Mesopotamien. Festschrift für Claus Wilcke / W. von Sallaberger, K. Volk, A. Zgoll (Hrsg). Wiesbaden, 63–76.
  14. Dassow E. von (в печати): Awīlum and muškēnum in the Age of Hammurabi // Compte rendu de la 55e rencontre assyriologique internationale.
  15. Dossin G. 1972: Le madārum dans les «Archives royales de Mari» // RAI 18, 53–63.
  16. Durand J.-M. 1987: La «Grande Pontife» // NABU. 12/b, 7.
  17. Durand J.-M. 1990: Problèmes d’eau et d’irrigation au royaume de Mari: l’apport des textes anciens // Techniques et pratiques hydro-agricoles traditionnelles en domaine irrigué / G. Beyer (ed.). Damas–Paris, 101–142.
  18. Durand J.-M. 1991: Précurseurs syriens aux Protocoles néo-assyriens // Marchands, diplomates et empereurs. Études sur la civilisation mésopotamienne offertes à Paul Garelli / D. Charpin, F. Joannès (eds.). P., 13–71.
  19. Durand J.-M. 1994: Administrateurs de Qaṭṭunân // FM 2, 83–114.
  20. Fleming D. 2004: Democracy’s Ancient Ancestors. Mari and Early Collective Governance. Cambr.
  21. Frankena R. 1968: Briefe aus Leidener Sammlung (TLB V). Leiden, (Altbabylonische Briefe. 3).
  22. Frankena R. 1978: Kommentar zu den altbabylonischen Briefen aus Lagaba und anderen Orten. Leiden.
  23. Goetze A. 1956: The Laws of Eshnunna. New Haven (The Annual of the American Schools of Oriental Research 1951–1952. Vol. 31).
  24. Guichard M. 1997: Présages fortuits à Mari (copies et ajouts à ARMT XXVI/1) // MARI. 8, 305–328.
  25. Guichard M. 2010: Šuduhum, un royaume d’Ida-Maraṣ et ses rois Yatâr-malik, Hammī-kūn et Amud-pā-El // Entre les fleuves – I. Untersuchungen zur historischen Geographie Obermesopotamiens im 2. Jahrtausend v. Chr. / E. von Cancik-Kirschbaum, N. Ziegle (Hrsg.). B. (Berliner Beiträge zum Vorderen Orient. 20), 75–120.
  26. Guichard M. 2011: Un David raté ou une histoire de habiru à l’époque amorrite // Le jeune héros. Recherches sur la formation et la diffusion d’un thème littéraire au Proche-Orient ancien / J.-M. Durand, Th. Römer, M. Langlois (eds.). Fribourg–Göttingen (Orbis Biblicus et Orientalis. 250), 29–93.
  27. Heimpel W. 2003: Letters to the King of Mari. A New Translation, with Historical Introduction, Notes, and Commentary. Winona Lake.
  28. Jacobsen T. 1993: Notes on the Word lú // kinattūttu ša dārâti. Raphael Kutscher Memorial Volume. Tel Aviv (Journal of the Institute of Archaelogy of Tel Aviv University Occasional Publications No. 1. Tel Aviv), 69–79.
  29. Kienast B. 1972: Zu muškēnum = maul… // RAI 18, 99–103.
  30. Koppen F. van 2001: The Organisation of the Institutional Agriculture in Mari // Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient. Vol. 44, 451–504.
  31. Kraus F.R. 1958: Ein Edikt des Königs Ammi-ṣaduqa von Babylon. Leiden (SD. Vol. 5).
  32. Kraus F.R. 1973: Vom mesopotamischen Menschen der altbabylonischen Zeit und seiner Welt. Amsterdam–London.
  33. Kraus F.R. 1984: Königliche Verfügungen in altbabylonischen Zeit. Leiden (SD. Vol. 11).
  34. Lacambre D., Millet Alba A. 2008: Chagar Bazar (Syrie) III. Les trouvailles épigraphiques et sigillographiques du Chantier I (2000–2002) / Ö. Tunca, A.-M. Baghdo (eds.). Louvain–Paris–Dudley.
  35. Moran W. 1992: The Amarna Letters. Baltimore–London.
  36. Postgate N. 1992: Early Mesopotamia. Society and Economy at the Dawn of History. L.–N.Y.
  37. Reculeau H. 2006: Recherches sur les paysages ruraux de la vallée du Moyen-Euphrate au deuxième millénaire av. J.-C. Thèse de doctorat, EPHE, SHP. P.
  38. Reculeau H. 2008: Tell Hariri / Mari: Textes. V. Environnement et occupation de l’espace. II. Les sédentaires // Supplément au dictionnaire de la Bible. Fasc. 77—78. P., 324–356.
  39. Schloen J.D. 2001: The House of the Father as Fact and Symbol. Patrimonialism in Ugarit and the Ancient Near East. Winona Lake (Studies in the Archaeology and History of the Levant. 2).
  40. Soden W. von 1964: muškēnum und die Mawālī des frühen Islam // ZA. 56, 133–141.
  41. Speiser E.A. 1958: The muškēnum // Orientalia. Vol. 27, 19–28.
  42. Stol M. 1997: Muškēnu // Reallexikon der Assyriologie. Bd 8. Lief. 7/8. B.–N.Y., 492–493.
  43. Streck M. 2006: Sibilants in the Old Babylonian Texts of Hammurapi and of the Governors of Qaṭṭunān // The Akkadian Language in Its Semitic Context. Studies in the Akkadian of the Third and Second Millennium BC / G. Deutscher, N.J.C. Kouwenberg (eds.). Leiden (PIHANS. 106), 215–251.
  44. Talon Ph. 2005: The Standard Babylonian Creation Myth Enūma Eliš. Helsinki (State Archives of Assyria Cuneiform Texts. Vol. 5).
  45. Van De Mieroop M. 2007: A History of the Ancient Near East ca. 3000–323 BC. 2nd ed. N.Y.
  46. Villard P. 1990: Documents pour l’histoire du royaume de Haute-Mésopotamie // MARI. 6, P., 559–584.
  47. Yaron R. 1969: The Laws of Eshnunna. Jerusalem.
  48. Yaron R. 1988: The Laws of Eshnunna. 2nd ed. Jerusalem–Leiden.
  49. Ziegler 2010 (в печати) // Revue d’Assyriologie. 2010. Vol. 104.